Contract Clause Risk Analyzer

What it takes in

The inputs you provide on each run, validated before anything executes.

5 tasks, run in order.

Each task passes its result to the next. Here's what each does and what it produces.

1. 01
   Parse {{contractText}} to identify all distinct clauses and sections. Create a structured clause index with section numbers, titles, and summary of each clause in one sentence. Flag the {{contractType}} to load the appropriate risk framework.

   Expected output

   JSON array of clauses: [{section_number, title, summary, page_reference}]. Minimum 10 clauses for standard contracts.
2. 02
   Analyze each clause against the risk framework for {{contractType}} contracts, considering our position as {{partyRole}}. For each clause, assess: (a) Does this create financial exposure? (b) Does this limit our rights? (c) Is this standard market practice or an outlier? (d) Does this create operational risk?

   Expected output

   JSON array of risk assessments: [{clause_id, clause_text_excerpt, risk_category, severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low), explanation, market_standard (Yes/No), financial_exposure_estimate}]
3. 03
   Identify MISSING clauses that should be present for a {{contractType}} agreement. Compare against the Standard Clause Checklist from the knowledge base. Each missing clause gets a severity rating based on how much risk the omission creates.

   Expected output

   JSON array of missing clauses: [{clause_name, why_needed, severity, recommended_language}]
4. 04
   Calculate the overall contract risk score (1-100) using the Contract Risk Scoring Matrix from the knowledge base. Apply weightings: Critical findings = 25 pts each (max 50), High = 10 pts each, Medium = 5 pts each, Low = 2 pts each. Missing critical clauses add 15 pts each. Cap at 100.

   Expected output

   JSON object: {total_score, risk_level (Low Risk / Moderate / High / Critical), category_breakdown, top_3_concerns, deal_recommendation (Proceed / Proceed with Changes / Reject)}
5. 05
   Generate the final redline report with: executive summary (3 sentences), risk scorecard, clause-by-clause findings with proposed alternative language, list of missing provisions with recommended additions, and a negotiation priority list (what to push back on first).

   Expected output

   Structured markdown report: Executive Summary, Risk Score Card, Clause Analysis Table (clause | risk | recommendation | alternative language), Missing Provisions, Negotiation Priorities (ranked 1-N)

Tools it uses

What you can do with it